Proceed — the supplier is real and capable; close one documentation gap before signing.
Our on-the-ground verification found no critical or blocking risks. The entity is legally registered, export-eligible, and operates a modern, adequately utilised facility. The only open item is a missing ISO 9001 certificate, which we recommend resolving contractually before the first order.
This is a supplier you can start with on standard terms. The risk is not "is it real?" but "confirm the quality paperwork" — a routine procurement step, not a red flag.
We verified existence, eligibility and capability — not just a website profile.
The engagement answered one question for the buyer: "Can we safely place a first order with this supplier?" We combined desktop registry checks with an unannounced on-site visit.
| Dimension | What we checked | Result |
|---|---|---|
| Legal existence | Business registration, unified social credit code, operating status | Verified |
| Export eligibility | Export license, product certifications (CE) | Verified |
| Capability | Facility, equipment, workforce, observed utilisation | Verified |
| On-site condition | Unannounced walk-through, photo & video evidence | Observed |
| Risk flags | Litigation, credit, certificate gaps | 1 to close |
Method: registry database review, document collection, on-site audit with timestamped photos/videos, and interviews with operations staff. Limitations: financial statements were not independently audited; this is a redacted sample, not live client data.
The entity checks out — established 13 years, active, export-licensed.
| Attribute | Finding | Status |
|---|---|---|
| Legal name | Nanyang Precision Components Co., Ltd. [redacted] | Verified |
| Unified social credit code | [REDACTED] | Verified |
| Date established | 2013 (13 years trading) | Verified |
| Registered capital | RMB 50M (paid-in confirmed) | Verified |
| Operating status | Active · no abnormal records | Verified |
| Export license | Valid, in scope for product line | Verified |
| Product certification (CE) | CE for declared models | Verified |
| Quality certificate (ISO 9001) | Not provided at engagement | Request |
| Litigation / credit | No major rulings; clean credit | Clear |
Capacity is real and under-utilised — headroom exists for scale-up.
The facility is owned (not leased), modern, and running at roughly 70% utilisation. That leaves margin to absorb a new buyer's volume without lead-time surprises.
Stated annual capacity (1.2M units) is credible against observed lines and headcount. The gap to watch is formal QMS documentation, not physical capability.
One medium issue, two low — none blocking.
| Finding | Severity | Why it matters | Recommended action |
|---|---|---|---|
| ISO 9001 not provided | Medium | No documentary evidence of a formal quality management system. | Request certificate + add a quality clause and inspection right to the PO. |
| Single freight forwarder | Low | Concentration risk on logistics. | Name alternatives / diversify in contract. |
| Thin public footprint | Low | Harder to triangulate reputation online. | Request 2 client references before committing volume. |
Timestamped, geo-consistent photos confirm the visit happened.
In the full report, each placeholder is replaced with the actual photo and a short verification note. Redacted sample shown.
Green-light the relationship; sequence the paperwork.
Recommended next steps
- Request the ISO 9001 certificate and latest product test reports; treat as a condition precedent to the first PO.
- Build quality protection into the contract: incoming-inspection right, defect-rate remedy, and a pre-shipment inspection clause.
- Start with a trial order (the buyer's $99/day interpreter engagement is the natural first step) before scaling volume.
- Optional: commission a pre-shipment inspection once production begins.
Canton Concierge · China supplier verification, factory visits & exhibition interpretation · cantonconciergecn@gmail.com